ATI Radeon HD 5570 versus AMD Radeon HD 6670
Comparaison des cartes vidéo ATI Radeon HD 5570 and AMD Radeon HD 6670 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le ATI Radeon HD 5570
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 69% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 39 Watt versus 66 Watt
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 49.016 versus 38.551
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 11 October 2011 versus 19 April 2011 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 39 Watt versus 66 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 235.572 versus 235.463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 49.016 versus 38.551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 versus 3348 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 versus 3348 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6670
- Environ 23% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 800 MHz versus 650 MHz
- Environ 48% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 19.2 GTexel / s versus 13 GTexel / s
- Environ 20% de pipelines plus haut: 480 versus 400
- Environ 48% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 768.0 gflops versus 520.0 gflops
- Environ 5% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1050 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 724 versus 478
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 247 versus 198
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 1905 versus 1370
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.861 versus 4.393
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.463 versus 0.454
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.918 versus 11.345
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1564 versus 1160
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3260 versus 1883
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1564 versus 1160
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3260 versus 1883
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse augmenté | 800 MHz versus 650 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 19.2 GTexel / s versus 13 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 480 versus 400 |
| Performance á point flottant | 768.0 gflops versus 520.0 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1050 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 724 versus 478 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 247 versus 198 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1905 versus 1370 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.861 versus 4.393 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.463 versus 0.454 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.918 versus 11.345 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1564 versus 1160 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3260 versus 1883 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1564 versus 1160 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3260 versus 1883 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: ATI Radeon HD 5570
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6670
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | ATI Radeon HD 5570 | AMD Radeon HD 6670 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 478 | 724 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 198 | 247 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1370 | 1905 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.393 | 4.861 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 235.572 | 235.463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.454 | 0.463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.345 | 15.918 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 49.016 | 38.551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1160 | 1564 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1883 | 3260 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3348 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1160 | 1564 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1883 | 3260 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3348 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| ATI Radeon HD 5570 | AMD Radeon HD 6670 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | TeraScale 2 |
| Nom de code | Turks | Turks |
| Conception | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series |
| Date de sortie | 11 October 2011 | 19 April 2011 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1369 | 1255 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $99 | |
| Prix maintenant | $102.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 13.12 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 650 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 650 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 520.0 gflops | 768.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 400 | 480 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 13 GTexel / s | 19.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 39 Watt | 66 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 716 million | 716 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| VGA | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 165 mm | 168 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 25.6 GB / s | 64 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1000 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer ATI Radeon HD 5570 avec des autres
ATIRadeon HD 5570 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 360M
ATIRadeon HD 5570 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5750
ATIRadeon HD 5570 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6630M
ATIRadeon HD 5570 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 OEM
ATIRadeon HD 5570 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K600
ATIRadeon HD 5570 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 820M
