NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM versus ATI Radeon HD 5570
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM and ATI Radeon HD 5570 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 23% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 797 MHz versus 650 MHz
- Environ 96% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 25.5 GTexel / s versus 13 GTexel / s
- Environ 18% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 612.1 gflops versus 520.0 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 78% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1782 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 9.932 versus 4.393
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 254.345 versus 235.572
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.14 versus 0.454
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.613 versus 11.345
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1502 versus 1160
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2167 versus 1883
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1502 versus 1160
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2167 versus 1883
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 24 April 2012 versus 11 October 2011 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 797 MHz versus 650 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.5 GTexel / s versus 13 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 612.1 gflops versus 520.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1782 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.932 versus 4.393 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 254.345 versus 235.572 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.14 versus 0.454 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.613 versus 11.345 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1502 versus 1160 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2167 versus 1883 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1502 versus 1160 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2167 versus 1883 |
Raisons pour considerer le ATI Radeon HD 5570
- Environ 4% de pipelines plus haut: 400 versus 384
- Environ 28% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 39 Watt versus 50 Watt
- 3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 49.016 versus 15.32
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 versus 3334
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 versus 3334
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 400 versus 384 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 39 Watt versus 50 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 49.016 versus 15.32 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 versus 3334 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 versus 3334 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5570
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM | ATI Radeon HD 5570 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.932 | 4.393 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 254.345 | 235.572 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.14 | 0.454 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.613 | 11.345 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 15.32 | 49.016 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1502 | 1160 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2167 | 1883 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3334 | 3360 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1502 | 1160 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2167 | 1883 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3334 | 3360 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 476 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 193 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1377 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM | ATI Radeon HD 5570 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
| Nom de code | GK107 | Turks |
| Date de sortie | 24 April 2012 | 11 October 2011 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1386 | 1387 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Conception | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 797 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 612.1 gflops | 520.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 400 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.5 GTexel / s | 13 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 39 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,270 million | 716 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 650 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 145 mm | 165 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.51 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1782 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 OEM vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5750
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 415M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 OEM vs
ATIRadeon HD 5570
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 OEM vs
AMDRadeon HD 7540D IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 OEM vs
AMDRadeon R7 M270
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 OEM vs
IntelUHD Graphics 620
