Apple M1 7-core versus AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Apple M1 7-core and AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Mémoire, Technologies, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Apple M1 7-core
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 8 mois plus tard
- 4.3x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1278 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 5 nm versus 14 nm
- Environ 7% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 14 Watt versus 15 Watt
- 2.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 18993 versus 8803
- 6.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10433 versus 1514
- 6.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10433 versus 1514
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3723 versus 2433
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3723 versus 2433
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 10 Nov 2020 versus 13 February 2018 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1278 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 5 nm versus 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt versus 15 Watt |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 18993 versus 8803 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10433 versus 1514 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10433 versus 1514 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 versus 2433 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 versus 2433 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6729 versus 3364
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6729 versus 3364
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6729 versus 3364 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6729 versus 3364 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Apple M1 7-core
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Apple M1 7-core | AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 18993 | 8803 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10433 | 1514 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10433 | 1514 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 | 2433 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 | 2433 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3364 | 6729 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3364 | 6729 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1579 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 408 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.891 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 365.4 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.104 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.17 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 132.07 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 705 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Apple M1 7-core | AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Date de sortie | 10 Nov 2020 | 13 February 2018 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 419 | 932 |
| Genre | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | |
| Nom de code | Owl | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 1278 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 590 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4750 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.290 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 7 | |
| Render output units | 28 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1300 MHz | |
| Compte de transistor | 4,940 million | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 66.67 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | |
| Genre de mémoire | LPDDR4X-4266 | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | IGP | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Apple M1 7-core avec des autres
AppleM1 7-core vs
ATIRadeon X1900 GT
AppleM1 7-core vs
ATIMobility FireGL V5725
AppleM1 7-core vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN
AppleM1 7-core vs
AMDFirePro R5000
AppleM1 7-core vs
AMDRadeon HD 7990
AppleM1 7-core vs
AppleM1 8-core
