Apple M1 7-core vs AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded
Comparative analysis of Apple M1 7-core and AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Memory, Technologies, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Apple M1 7-core
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 4.3x more core clock speed: 1278 MHz vs 300 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 15 Watt
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18993 vs 8803
- 6.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10433 vs 1514
- 6.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10433 vs 1514
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3723 vs 2433
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3723 vs 2433
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 Nov 2020 vs 13 February 2018 |
| Core clock speed | 1278 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt vs 15 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 18993 vs 8803 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10433 vs 1514 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10433 vs 1514 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 vs 2433 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 vs 2433 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6729 vs 3364
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6729 vs 3364
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6729 vs 3364 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6729 vs 3364 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Apple M1 7-core
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Apple M1 7-core | AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 18993 | 8803 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10433 | 1514 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10433 | 1514 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 | 2433 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 | 2433 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3364 | 6729 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3364 | 6729 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1579 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 408 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.891 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 365.4 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.104 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.17 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 132.07 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 705 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Apple M1 7-core | AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Launch date | 10 Nov 2020 | 13 February 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 419 | 932 |
| Type | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | |
| Code name | Owl | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1278 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 590 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4750 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.290 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 7 | |
| Render output units | 28 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 4,940 million | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 66.67 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X-4266 | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | IGP | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Apple M1 7-core with others
AppleM1 7-core vs
ATIRadeon X1900 GT
AppleM1 7-core vs
ATIMobility FireGL V5725
AppleM1 7-core vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN
AppleM1 7-core vs
AMDFirePro R5000
AppleM1 7-core vs
AMDRadeon HD 7990
AppleM1 7-core vs
AppleM1 8-core
