Intel HD Graphics 4600 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 4600 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4600
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 22 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 44% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 45 Watt versus 65 Watt
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 314 versus 225
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 3210 versus 2473
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.844 versus 6.498
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 171.17 versus 140.06
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.115 versus 0.502
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.385 versus 9.613
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2808 versus 2073
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2808 versus 2073
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 194 versus 170
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 3 June 2013 versus 15 May 2012 |
Processus de fabrication | 22 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt versus 65 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 314 versus 225 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3210 versus 2473 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.844 versus 6.498 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.17 versus 140.06 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.115 versus 0.502 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.385 versus 9.613 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2808 versus 2073 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2808 versus 2073 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 194 versus 170 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
- 2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 810 MHz versus 400 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 12.96 GTexel / s versus 5 GTexel / s
- 4.8x plus de pipelines: 96 versus 20
- 6.2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 311.0 gflops versus 50 gflops
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 681 versus 630
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 12.49 versus 12.361
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1151 versus 988
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1853 versus 1702
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1151 versus 988
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1853 versus 1702
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz versus 400 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12.96 GTexel / s versus 5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 96 versus 20 |
Performance á point flottant | 311.0 gflops versus 50 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 681 versus 630 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.49 versus 12.361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1151 versus 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1853 versus 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1151 versus 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1853 versus 1702 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 630 | 681 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 314 | 225 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3210 | 2473 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.844 | 6.498 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.17 | 140.06 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.115 | 0.502 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.385 | 9.613 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.361 | 12.49 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 988 | 1151 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1702 | 1853 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2808 | 2073 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 988 | 1151 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1702 | 1853 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2808 | 2073 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 194 | 170 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel HD Graphics 4600 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Fermi |
Nom de code | Haswell GT2 | GF108 |
Date de sortie | 3 June 2013 | 15 May 2012 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1359 | 1440 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $99.99 | |
Prix maintenant | $99.21 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 8.89 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1250 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 400 MHz | 810 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 50 gflops | 311.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 22 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 20 | 96 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 5 GTexel / s | 12.96 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 65 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 392 million | 585 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 145 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.8 GB / s | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |