Intel HD Graphics 530 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 530 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 530
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 51% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 25.2 GTexel / s versus 16.74 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 3.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 49 Watt
- 64x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 64 GB versus 1 GB
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.747 versus 10.475
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 330.464 versus 173.537
- 56.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.804 versus 0.032
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.781 versus 8.717
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 30.177 versus 10.454
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 versus 3220
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 versus 3220
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 versus 29 May 2013 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.2 GTexel / s versus 16.74 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 49 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 64 GB versus 1 GB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.747 versus 10.475 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 330.464 versus 173.537 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.804 versus 0.032 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.781 versus 8.717 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.177 versus 10.454 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 versus 3220 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 versus 3220 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
- 3x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1046 MHz versus 350 MHz
- 16x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 24
- Environ 99% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 803.3 gflops versus 403.2 gflops
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2309 versus 1045
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3354 versus 2393
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2309 versus 1045
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3354 versus 2393
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1046 MHz versus 350 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 24 |
| Performance á point flottant | 803.3 gflops versus 403.2 gflops |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2309 versus 1045 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3354 versus 2393 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2309 versus 1045 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3354 versus 2393 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 530
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel HD Graphics 530 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 997 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4387 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.747 | 10.475 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 330.464 | 173.537 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.804 | 0.032 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.781 | 8.717 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.177 | 10.454 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1045 | 2309 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2393 | 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3220 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1045 | 2309 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2393 | 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3220 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 384 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel HD Graphics 530 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Kepler 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Skylake GT2 | GK208 |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 | 29 May 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1269 | 1272 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $89 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz | 1046 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 403.2 gflops | 803.3 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 384 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.2 GTexel / s | 16.74 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 49 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x8 |
| Longeur | 145 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 64 GB | 1 GB |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 40.06 GB / s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5008 MHz | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel HD Graphics 530 avec des autres
IntelHD Graphics 530 vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5600 Ultra
IntelHD Graphics 530 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
IntelHD Graphics 530 vs
AMDRadeon R5 235 OEM
IntelHD Graphics 530 vs
AMDRadeon R8 M365DX
IntelHD Graphics 530 vs
AMDRadeon R8 M350DX
IntelHD Graphics 530 vs
AMDRadeon Vega 3
