Intel HD Graphics 630 versus AMD Radeon R7 M460
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 630 and AMD Radeon R7 M460 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 630
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 2% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1150 MHz versus 1125 MHz
- Environ 2% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 27.6 GTexel / s versus 27 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 32x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 64 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1111 versus 1073
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 268 versus 204
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.948 versus 19.679
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.795 versus 1.572
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1945 versus 1767
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3344 versus 2772
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1945 versus 1767
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3344 versus 2772
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 30 August 2016 versus 15 May 2016 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz versus 1125 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 27.6 GTexel / s versus 27 GTexel / s |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 64 GB versus 2 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1111 versus 1073 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 268 versus 204 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.948 versus 19.679 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.795 versus 1.572 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1945 versus 1767 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 versus 2772 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1945 versus 1767 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 versus 2772 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 M460
- 3.1x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1100 MHz versus 350 MHz
- 16x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 24
- Environ 96% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 864.0 gflops versus 441.6 gflops
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4999 versus 4580
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 358.673 versus 312.246
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.024 versus 20.404
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 85.168 versus 32.567
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2294 versus 1859
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2294 versus 1859
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1100 MHz versus 350 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 versus 24 |
Performance á point flottant | 864.0 gflops versus 441.6 gflops |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4999 versus 4580 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 358.673 versus 312.246 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.024 versus 20.404 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 85.168 versus 32.567 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2294 versus 1859 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2294 versus 1859 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 630
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M460
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | Intel HD Graphics 630 | AMD Radeon R7 M460 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1111 | 1073 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 268 | 204 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4580 | 4999 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.948 | 19.679 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 312.246 | 358.673 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.795 | 1.572 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.404 | 30.024 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 32.567 | 85.168 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1859 | 2294 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1945 | 1767 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 | 2772 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1859 | 2294 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1945 | 1767 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 | 2772 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 388 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel HD Graphics 630 | AMD Radeon R7 M460 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 3.0 |
Nom de code | Kaby Lake GT2 | Meso |
Date de sortie | 30 August 2016 | 15 May 2016 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1242 | 1243 |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 441.6 gflops | 864.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 27.6 GTexel / s | 27 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Compte de transistor | 189 million | 3,100 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 64 GB | 2 GB |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | 0 |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz |