Intel UHD Graphics 610 versus Intel UHD Graphics 630
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 610 and Intel UHD Graphics 630 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 610
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 mois plus tard
Date de sortie | 3 April 2018 versus 1 September 2017 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 630
- Environ 17% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 350 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 14% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1200 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1237 versus 693
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 299 versus 171
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4657 versus 2697
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1870 versus 1071
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1870 versus 1071
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1596 versus 1241
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1596 versus 1241
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 versus 1699
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 versus 1699
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz versus 300 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1237 versus 693 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 299 versus 171 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4657 versus 2697 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 versus 1071 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 versus 1071 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 versus 1241 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 versus 1241 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 versus 1699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 versus 1699 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 610
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 630
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 610 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 693 | 1237 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 171 | 299 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2697 | 4657 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1071 | 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1071 | 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1241 | 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1241 | 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1699 | 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1699 | 3309 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.517 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.254 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.807 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.323 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.327 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 68 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel UHD Graphics 610 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Generation 9.5 |
Nom de code | Coffee Lake GT1 | Coffee Lake GT2 |
Date de sortie | 3 April 2018 | 1 September 2017 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1350 | 1234 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1050 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 350 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 189 million | 189 million |
Performance á point flottant | 460.8 gflops | |
Pipelines | 24 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.8 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |