Intel UHD Graphics 630 versus Intel HD Graphics 6000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 630 and Intel HD Graphics 6000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 630
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 17% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 350 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 20% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1200 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1243 versus 865
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 302 versus 276
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4671 versus 3547
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1870 versus 1225
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1596 versus 1363
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 versus 3259
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1870 versus 1225
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1596 versus 1363
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 versus 3259
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 versus 5 September 2014 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1243 versus 865 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 302 versus 276 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4671 versus 3547 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 versus 1225 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 versus 1363 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 versus 3259 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 versus 1225 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 versus 1363 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 versus 3259 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 6000
- 2x plus de pipelines: 48 versus 24
| Pipelines | 48 versus 24 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 6000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | Intel HD Graphics 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1243 | 865 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 302 | 276 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4671 | 3547 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.89 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 340.911 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.785 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.414 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.514 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 | 1225 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 | 1363 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 3259 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 | 1225 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 | 1363 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 3259 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 421 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel UHD Graphics 630 | Intel HD Graphics 6000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Generation 8.0 |
| Nom de code | Coffee Lake GT2 | Broadwell GT3 |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 | 5 September 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1219 | 1119 |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 460.8 gflops | |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 48 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.8 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 189 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel UHD Graphics 630 avec des autres
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5900 ZT
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 940M
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M375
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M460
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 617
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics 940
