Intel UHD Graphics 630 versus AMD Radeon R7 M460
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 630 and AMD Radeon R7 M460 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 630
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 7% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1200 MHz versus 1125 MHz
- Environ 7% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 28.8 GTexel / s versus 27 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1243 versus 1069
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 301 versus 205
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.491 versus 19.679
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.785 versus 1.572
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 versus 2772
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 versus 2772
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 versus 15 May 2016 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz versus 1125 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.8 GTexel / s versus 27 GTexel / s |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1243 versus 1069 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 301 versus 205 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.491 versus 19.679 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.785 versus 1.572 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 versus 2772 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 versus 2772 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 M460
- 3.1x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1100 MHz versus 350 MHz
- 16x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 24
- Environ 88% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 864.0 gflops versus 460.8 gflops
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4999 versus 4641
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 358.673 versus 340.911
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.024 versus 20.414
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 85.168 versus 29.514
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2294 versus 1870
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1767 versus 1596
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2294 versus 1870
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1767 versus 1596
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1100 MHz versus 350 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 versus 24 |
Performance á point flottant | 864.0 gflops versus 460.8 gflops |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4999 versus 4641 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 358.673 versus 340.911 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.024 versus 20.414 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 85.168 versus 29.514 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2294 versus 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1767 versus 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2294 versus 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1767 versus 1596 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M460
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | AMD Radeon R7 M460 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1243 | 1069 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 301 | 205 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4641 | 4999 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.491 | 19.679 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 340.911 | 358.673 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.785 | 1.572 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.414 | 30.024 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.514 | 85.168 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 | 2294 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 | 1767 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 2772 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 | 2294 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 | 1767 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 2772 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 420 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel UHD Graphics 630 | AMD Radeon R7 M460 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 3.0 |
Nom de code | Coffee Lake GT2 | Meso |
Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 | 15 May 2016 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1240 | 1242 |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 460.8 gflops | 864.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.8 GTexel / s | 27 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Compte de transistor | 189 million | 3,100 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | 0 |
RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |