Intel UHD Graphics 630 versus NVIDIA GeForce 940M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce 940M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 630
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 2% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1200 MHz versus 1176 MHz
- Environ 2% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 28.8 GTexel / s versus 28.22 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 33 Watt
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1244 versus 1123
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 302 versus 153
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.89 versus 25.98
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 340.911 versus 168.449
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.785 versus 1.307
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 versus 13 March 2015 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz versus 1176 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.8 GTexel / s versus 28.22 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 33 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1244 versus 1123 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 302 versus 153 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.89 versus 25.98 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 340.911 versus 168.449 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.785 versus 1.307 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 940M
- 3.1x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1072 MHz versus 350 MHz
- 16x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 24
- Environ 96% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 903.2 gflops versus 460.8 gflops
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5791 versus 4671
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.837 versus 20.414
- 3.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 101.399 versus 29.514
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2132 versus 1870
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3065 versus 1596
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 versus 3309
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2132 versus 1870
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3065 versus 1596
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 versus 3309
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 506 versus 421
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1072 MHz versus 350 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 24 |
| Performance á point flottant | 903.2 gflops versus 460.8 gflops |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5791 versus 4671 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.837 versus 20.414 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 101.399 versus 29.514 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2132 versus 1870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3065 versus 1596 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3309 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2132 versus 1870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3065 versus 1596 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3309 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 506 versus 421 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 940M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce 940M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1244 | 1123 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 302 | 153 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4671 | 5791 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.89 | 25.98 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 340.911 | 168.449 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.785 | 1.307 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.414 | 21.837 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.514 | 101.399 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 | 2132 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 | 3065 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 | 2132 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 | 3065 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 421 | 506 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel UHD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce 940M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Maxwell |
| Nom de code | Coffee Lake GT2 | GM108 |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 | 13 March 2015 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1219 | 1222 |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | 1176 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz | 1072 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 460.8 gflops | 903.2 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 384 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.8 GTexel / s | 28.22 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 33 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 1,870 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | 0 |
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel UHD Graphics 630 avec des autres
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5900 ZT
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 940M
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M375
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M460
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 617
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics 940
