Intel UHD Graphics 630 versus Intel HD Graphics 630
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 630 and Intel HD Graphics 630 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 630
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 4% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1200 MHz versus 1150 MHz
- Environ 4% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 28.8 GTexel / s versus 27.6 GTexel / s
- Environ 4% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 460.8 gflops versus 441.6 gflops
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1243 versus 1111
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 301 versus 267
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4641 versus 4588
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 340.911 versus 312.246
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1870 versus 1859
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1870 versus 1859
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 420 versus 388
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 versus 30 August 2016 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz versus 1150 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.8 GTexel / s versus 27.6 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 460.8 gflops versus 441.6 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1243 versus 1111 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 301 versus 267 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4641 versus 4588 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 340.911 versus 312.246 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.414 versus 20.404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 versus 1859 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 versus 1859 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 420 versus 388 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 630
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.948 versus 27.491
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.795 versus 1.785
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 32.567 versus 29.514
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1945 versus 1596
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3344 versus 3309
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1945 versus 1596
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3344 versus 3309
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.948 versus 27.491 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.795 versus 1.785 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 32.567 versus 29.514 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1945 versus 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 versus 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1945 versus 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 versus 3309 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 630
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | Intel HD Graphics 630 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1243 | 1111 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 301 | 267 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4641 | 4588 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.491 | 27.948 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 340.911 | 312.246 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.785 | 1.795 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.414 | 20.404 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.514 | 32.567 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 | 1859 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 | 1945 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 | 1859 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 | 1945 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 3344 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 420 | 388 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel UHD Graphics 630 | Intel HD Graphics 630 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Generation 9.5 |
Nom de code | Coffee Lake GT2 | Kaby Lake GT2 |
Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 | 30 August 2016 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1240 | 1241 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz | 350 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 460.8 gflops | 441.6 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 24 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.8 GTexel / s | 27.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 189 million | 189 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | 1 |
RAM maximale | 64 GB | |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |