Intel UHD Graphics 630 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 520
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 630
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 ans 4 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 28.8 GTexel / s versus 6.5 billion / sec
- 3x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 460.8 gflops versus 155.52 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 93% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 29 Watt
- 3.9x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1237 versus 319
- 2.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 299 versus 136
- 3.6x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4657 versus 1277
- 10.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.517 versus 2.597
- 4.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 354.254 versus 76.214
- 7.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.807 versus 0.239
- 3.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.323 versus 5.862
- 6.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 29.327 versus 4.574
- 3.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1870 versus 545
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1596 versus 903
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 versus 1455
- 3.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1870 versus 545
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1596 versus 903
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 versus 1455
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 versus 13 April 2011 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.8 GTexel / s versus 6.5 billion / sec |
Performance á point flottant | 460.8 gflops versus 155.52 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 29 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1237 versus 319 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 299 versus 136 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4657 versus 1277 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.517 versus 2.597 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.254 versus 76.214 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.807 versus 0.239 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.323 versus 5.862 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.327 versus 4.574 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 versus 545 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 versus 903 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 versus 1455 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 versus 545 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 versus 903 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 versus 1455 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 520
- 4.6x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1620 MHz versus 350 MHz
- 2x plus de pipelines: 48 versus 24
Vitesse du noyau | 1620 MHz versus 350 MHz |
Pipelines | 48 versus 24 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 520
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1237 | 319 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 299 | 136 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4657 | 1277 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.517 | 2.597 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.254 | 76.214 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.807 | 0.239 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.323 | 5.862 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.327 | 4.574 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 | 545 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 | 903 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 1455 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 | 545 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 | 903 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 1455 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 68 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel UHD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Fermi 2.0 |
Nom de code | Coffee Lake GT2 | GF119 |
Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 | 13 April 2011 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1234 | 1603 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $59 | |
Prix maintenant | $59.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 7.58 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz | 1620 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 460.8 gflops | 155.52 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 48 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.8 GTexel / s | 6.5 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 29 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 189 million | 292 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 48 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 102 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-IHDMIVGA (optional) |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Soutien de bus | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Hauteur | 2.7" (6.9 cm) | |
Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
RAM maximale | 1 GB (DDR3) | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 900 MHz (DDR3) | |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
CUDA |