Intel UHD Graphics 770 versus AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 770 and AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Soutien API, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 770
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 17% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1450 MHz versus 1240 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 23.20 GTexel/s versus 55 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 10 nm versus 14 nm
- 4.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 65 Watt
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.442 versus 40.991
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1011.7 versus 364.578
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 4 Nov 2021 versus 13 February 2018 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1450 MHz versus 1240 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 23.20 GTexel/s versus 55 GTexel / s |
Processus de fabrication | 10 nm versus 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 65 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.442 versus 40.991 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1011.7 versus 364.578 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
- 2.8x plus de pipelines: 704 versus 256
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 523 versus 507
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2112 versus 1896
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 14540 versus 7653
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.196 versus 2.846
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 54.784 versus 40.941
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 262.35 versus 94.384
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1201 versus 738
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 704 versus 256 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 523 versus 507 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2112 versus 1896 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14540 versus 7653 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.196 versus 2.846 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 54.784 versus 40.941 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 262.35 versus 94.384 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1201 versus 738 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 770
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 507 | 523 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1896 | 2112 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7653 | 14540 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.442 | 40.991 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1011.7 | 364.578 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.846 | 3.196 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.941 | 54.784 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 94.384 | 262.35 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 738 | 1201 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3455 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1857 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3107 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3455 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1857 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3107 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel UHD Graphics 770 | AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.2 | GCN 5.0 |
Nom de code | Alder Lake GT1 | Raven |
Date de sortie | 4 Nov 2021 | 13 February 2018 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 829 | 830 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1450 MHz | 1240 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 32 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 10 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 185.6 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1485 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 742.4 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 256 | 704 |
Pixel fill rate | 11.60 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 23.20 GTexel/s | 55 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
Performance á point flottant | 1,760 gflops | |
Compte de transistor | 4,940 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | IGP | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Mémoire |
||
Mémoire partagé | 0 |