Intel UHD Graphics 770 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 770 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Soutien API, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 770
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 82% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1450 MHz versus 797 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 23.20 GTexel/s versus 63.76 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 10 nm versus 28 nm
- 5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 75 Watt
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 489 versus 340
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.442 versus 29.528
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1011.7 versus 731.755
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.846 versus 2.486
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 94.384 versus 87.659
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 4 Nov 2021 versus 30 May 2013 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1450 MHz versus 797 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 23.20 GTexel/s versus 63.76 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 10 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 75 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 489 versus 340 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.442 versus 29.528 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1011.7 versus 731.755 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.846 versus 2.486 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 94.384 versus 87.659 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
- 2.7x plus de vitesse du noyau: 811 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 3.8x plus de pipelines: 960 versus 256
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2796 versus 1860
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 8599 versus 7542
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 42.15 versus 40.941
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 964 versus 741
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 811 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 960 versus 256 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2796 versus 1860 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8599 versus 7542 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.15 versus 40.941 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 964 versus 741 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 770
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 489 | 340 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1860 | 2796 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7542 | 8599 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.442 | 29.528 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1011.7 | 731.755 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.846 | 2.486 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.941 | 42.15 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 94.384 | 87.659 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 741 | 964 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4133 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3651 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4133 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3651 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel UHD Graphics 770 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.2 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Alder Lake GT1 | GK106 |
| Date de sortie | 4 Nov 2021 | 30 May 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 830 | 843 |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $189.99 | |
| Prix maintenant | $177.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 19.67 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1450 MHz | 797 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 32 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 811 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 185.6 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1485 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 742.4 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 256 | 960 |
| Pixel fill rate | 11.60 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 23.20 GTexel/s | 63.76 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Noyaux CUDA | 960 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,530 gflops | |
| Compte de transistor | 2,540 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 API |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Options SLI | 1 | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 3 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 96.0 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel UHD Graphics 770 avec des autres
IntelUHD Graphics 770 vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 6400
IntelUHD Graphics 770 vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 7800
IntelUHD Graphics 770 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 2300
IntelUHD Graphics 770 vs
AMDRadeon R7 350X OEM
IntelUHD Graphics 770 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M1000M
IntelUHD Graphics 770 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M390
