Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) versus NVIDIA Quadro K4000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) and NVIDIA Quadro K4000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 10 nm versus 28 nm
- 3.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 25 Watt versus 80 Watt
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 versus 3321
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 versus 3321
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 28 May 2019 versus 1 March 2013 |
| Processus de fabrication | 10 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt versus 80 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 versus 3321 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 versus 3321 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K4000
- 2.7x plus de vitesse du noyau: 810 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 24x plus de pipelines: 768 versus 32
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3798 versus 1887
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3798 versus 1887
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3651 versus 3505
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3651 versus 3505
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 768 versus 32 |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3798 versus 1887 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3798 versus 1887 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3651 versus 3505 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3651 versus 3505 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4000
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | NVIDIA Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1887 | 3798 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1887 | 3798 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3505 | 3651 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3505 | 3651 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3321 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3321 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2719 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 418 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6676 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.462 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 427.88 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.899 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.742 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 61.965 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 817 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | NVIDIA Quadro K4000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Intel Gen. 11 (Ice Lake) | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Ice Lake G1 Gen. 11 | GK106 |
| Date de sortie | 28 May 2019 | 1 March 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 893 | 895 |
| Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $1,269 | |
| Prix maintenant | $225.65 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 14.81 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 810 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 32 | 768 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 80 Watt |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,244 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 51.84 GTexel / s | |
| Compte de transistor | 2,540 million | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Genre de mémoire | DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | Yes | |
| RAM maximale | 3 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 134.8 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5616 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Longeur | 241 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) avec des autres
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 448 Go
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
ATIRadeon Xpress 1250
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 7200
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 470M
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAQuadro K4000
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
AMDRadeon R5 340 OEM
