Intel UHD Graphics P630 versus AMD Radeon 530
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics P630 and AMD Radeon 530 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics P630
- Environ 17% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1200 MHz versus 1024 MHz
- 32x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 128 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2030 versus 1028
- Environ 86% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 327 versus 176
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5639 versus 5013
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2273 versus 2246
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2273 versus 2246
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz versus 1024 MHz |
Taille de mémore maximale | 128 GB versus 4 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2030 versus 1028 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 327 versus 176 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5639 versus 5013 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2273 versus 2246 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2273 versus 2246 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon 530
- 2.9x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1024 MHz versus 350 MHz
- 16x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 24
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2021 versus 2010
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 versus 3019
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2021 versus 2010
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 versus 3019
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1024 MHz versus 350 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 versus 24 |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2021 versus 2010 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 versus 3019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2021 versus 2010 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 versus 3019 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics P630
GPU 2: AMD Radeon 530
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | AMD Radeon 530 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2030 | 1028 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 327 | 176 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5639 | 5013 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.49 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 387.561 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.089 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.713 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 37.743 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2010 | 2021 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2273 | 2246 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3019 | 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2010 | 2021 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2273 | 2246 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3019 | 3355 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 506 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel UHD Graphics P630 | AMD Radeon 530 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1095 | 1096 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop, Laptop |
Architecture | GCN | |
Nom de code | Meso | |
Conception | Radeon 500 Series | |
Génération GCN | 3rd Gen | |
Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | 1024 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz | 1024 MHz |
Pipelines | 24 | 384 |
Unités de Compute | 6 | |
Performance á point flottant | 800 GFLOPs | |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | |
Pixel fill rate | 8.20 GP/s | |
Render output units | 8 | |
Stream Processors | 320/384 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 24.58 GTexel/s | |
Texture Units | 20/24 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 128 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 48 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4500 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3/GDDR5 | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Graphics Core Next (GCN) Architecture | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
DualGraphics | ||
Enduro | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None |