NVIDIA GeForce 705M versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce 705M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 705M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 mois plus tard
- 3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 45 Watt
- 2.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 455 versus 179
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 27 September 2013 versus 1 April 2013 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 45 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 455 versus 179 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M
- Environ 13% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 837 MHz versus 738 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 26.78 GTexel / s versus 5.904 GTexel / s
- 8x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 48
- 4.5x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 642.8 gflops versus 141.7 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- 2.4x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1097 versus 456
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.489 versus 4.569
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 202.905 versus 115.15
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.66 versus 0.373
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 8.184 versus 7.904
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 19.323 versus 11.055
- 2.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3133 versus 1131
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 versus 1629
- 2.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3133 versus 1131
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 versus 1629
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 837 MHz versus 738 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 26.78 GTexel / s versus 5.904 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 48 |
| Performance á point flottant | 642.8 gflops versus 141.7 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1097 versus 456 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.489 versus 4.569 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 202.905 versus 115.15 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.66 versus 0.373 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.184 versus 7.904 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.323 versus 11.055 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3133 versus 1131 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 versus 1629 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3133 versus 1131 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 versus 1629 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 705M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce 705M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 456 | 1097 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 455 | 179 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.569 | 10.489 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 115.15 | 202.905 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.373 | 0.66 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.904 | 8.184 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 11.055 | 19.323 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1131 | 3133 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1629 | 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1131 | 3133 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1629 | 3352 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3468 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2255 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2255 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce 705M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GF117 | GK107 |
| Date de sortie | 27 September 2013 | 1 April 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1271 | 1273 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 738 MHz | 837 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 141.7 gflops | 642.8 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 384 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 5.904 GTexel / s | 26.78 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 585 million | 1,270 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 2560x1600 | Up to 3840x2160 |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 2560x1600 | Up to 3840x2160 |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | Up to 1920x1200 |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | Up to 2048x1536 |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 API |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 / GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
