NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 versus NVIDIA GeForce 705M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 and NVIDIA GeForce 705M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 35% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 993 MHz versus 738 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 31.78 GTexel / s versus 5.904 GTexel / s
- 8x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 48
- 5.4x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 762.6 gflops versus 141.7 gflops
- 2.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5012 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- 3.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1469 versus 456
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 11.994 versus 4.569
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 291.627 versus 115.15
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.023 versus 0.373
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.139 versus 7.904
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 23.651 versus 11.055
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1427 versus 1131
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2153 versus 1629
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1427 versus 1131
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2153 versus 1629
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 29 May 2014 versus 27 September 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 993 MHz versus 738 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 31.78 GTexel / s versus 5.904 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 versus 48 |
Performance á point flottant | 762.6 gflops versus 141.7 gflops |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1469 versus 456 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.994 versus 4.569 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 291.627 versus 115.15 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.023 versus 0.373 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.139 versus 7.904 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.651 versus 11.055 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1427 versus 1131 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2153 versus 1629 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1427 versus 1131 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2153 versus 1629 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 705M
- 4.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 64 Watt
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 455 versus 349
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 64 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 455 versus 349 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 705M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 | NVIDIA GeForce 705M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1469 | 456 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 349 | 455 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4271 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.994 | 4.569 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 291.627 | 115.15 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.023 | 0.373 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.139 | 7.904 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.651 | 11.055 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1790 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1427 | 1131 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2153 | 1629 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1790 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1427 | 1131 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2153 | 1629 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 513 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 | NVIDIA GeForce 705M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi 2.0 |
Nom de code | GK107 | GF117 |
Date de sortie | 29 May 2014 | 27 September 2013 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $89 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1270 | 1271 |
Prix maintenant | $94.99 | |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 18.87 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 993 MHz | 738 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 762.6 gflops | 141.7 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 48 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 31.78 GTexel / s | 5.904 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt | 15 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,270 million | 585 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 2560x1600 | |
Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 2560x1600 | |
Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 145 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.19 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus |