NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) versus AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) and AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 33% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1228 MHz versus 925 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 30 Watt versus 65 Watt
- Environ 33% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 6000 MHz versus 4500 MHz
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2433 versus 1901
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 9864 versus 9694
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 36.898 versus 24.788
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 160.823 versus 112.347
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3629 versus 2809
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3629 versus 2809
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 17 May 2017 versus 30 June 2016 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1228 MHz versus 925 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt versus 65 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz versus 4500 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2433 versus 1901 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9864 versus 9694 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.898 versus 24.788 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 160.823 versus 112.347 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3629 versus 2809 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 versus 3666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3629 versus 2809 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 versus 3666 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 512 versus 384
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 530 versus 442
- 3.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 638.196 versus 170.785
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.619 versus 1.373
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 41.414 versus 18.937
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 3331
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 3331
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 512 versus 384 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 530 versus 442 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 638.196 versus 170.785 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.619 versus 1.373 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 41.414 versus 18.937 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3331 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3331 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2433 | 1901 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 442 | 530 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9864 | 9694 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.898 | 24.788 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 170.785 | 638.196 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.373 | 2.619 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.937 | 41.414 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 160.823 | 112.347 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3629 | 2809 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 | 3666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3629 | 2809 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 | 3666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 35 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
Nom de code | N17P-G1 | Cape Verde |
Date de sortie | 17 May 2017 | 30 June 2016 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $69.99 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 874 | 764 |
Prix maintenant | $59.99 | |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 63.91 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1670 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1228 MHz | 925 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 512 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 65 Watt |
Performance á point flottant | 947.2 gflops | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 29.6 GTexel / s | |
Compte de transistor | 1,500 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12_1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
Vulkan | ||
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz | 4500 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 72 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin |