NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) versus NVIDIA GeForce 940M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) and NVIDIA GeForce 940M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 15% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1228 MHz versus 1072 MHz
- Environ 42% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1670 MHz versus 1176 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 10% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 30 Watt versus 33 Watt
- 3.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6000 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- 2.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2433 versus 1127
- 2.9x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 442 versus 154
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 9864 versus 5982
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 36.898 versus 25.98
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 170.785 versus 168.449
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.373 versus 1.307
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 160.823 versus 101.399
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3629 versus 2132
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3684 versus 3065
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3629 versus 2132
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3684 versus 3065
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 17 May 2017 versus 13 March 2015 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1228 MHz versus 1072 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1670 MHz versus 1176 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt versus 33 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2433 versus 1127 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 442 versus 154 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9864 versus 5982 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.898 versus 25.98 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 170.785 versus 168.449 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.373 versus 1.307 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 160.823 versus 101.399 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3629 versus 2132 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 versus 3065 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3629 versus 2132 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 versus 3065 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 940M
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.837 versus 18.937
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 versus 3331
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 versus 3331
- 14.5x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 506 versus 35
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.837 versus 18.937 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3331 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3331 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 506 versus 35 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 940M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | NVIDIA GeForce 940M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2433 | 1127 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 442 | 154 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9864 | 5982 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.898 | 25.98 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 170.785 | 168.449 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.373 | 1.307 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.937 | 21.837 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 160.823 | 101.399 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3629 | 2132 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 | 3065 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3629 | 2132 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 | 3065 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 35 | 506 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | NVIDIA GeForce 940M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell |
Nom de code | N17P-G1 | GM108 |
Date de sortie | 17 May 2017 | 13 March 2015 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $69.99 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 874 | 1184 |
Prix maintenant | $59.99 | |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 63.91 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1670 MHz | 1176 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1228 MHz | 1072 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 33 Watt |
Performance á point flottant | 903.2 gflops | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.22 GTexel / s | |
Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12_1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
Vulkan | ||
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready | ||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Taille du laptop | medium sized |