NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 8 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 11.2 billion / sec versus 2.8 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 96 versus 48
- 2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 268.8 gflops versus 134.4 gflops
- Environ 2% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 49 Watt versus 50 Watt
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 1571 versus 1161
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.046 versus 3.121
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 6.791 versus 5.005
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 17.41 versus 8.55
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1683 versus 1626
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1683 versus 1626
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 15 May 2012 versus 3 September 2010 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 11.2 billion / sec versus 2.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 96 versus 48 |
| Performance á point flottant | 268.8 gflops versus 134.4 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt versus 50 Watt |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1571 versus 1161 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.046 versus 3.121 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.791 versus 5.005 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.41 versus 8.55 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1162 versus 1158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1683 versus 1626 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1162 versus 1158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1683 versus 1626 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM
- Environ 2% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 1048 MB versus 1 GB
- 1800x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 1.8 GB/s
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 426 versus 383
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 189 versus 158
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 109.787 versus 83.907
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 660 versus 614
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 660 versus 614
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 1048 MB versus 1 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 1.8 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 426 versus 383 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 189 versus 158 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 109.787 versus 83.907 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 660 versus 614 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 660 versus 614 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 383 | 426 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 158 | 189 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1571 | 1161 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.046 | 3.121 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 83.907 | 109.787 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.371 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.791 | 5.005 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.41 | 8.55 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 614 | 660 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1162 | 1158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1683 | 1626 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 614 | 660 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1162 | 1158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1683 | 1626 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
| Nom de code | GF108 | GF108 |
| Date de sortie | 15 May 2012 | 3 September 2010 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $39.99 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1554 | 1526 |
| Prix maintenant | $39.99 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 13.32 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 700 MHz | 700 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 96 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 268.8 gflops | 134.4 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Température maximale du GPU | 98 °C | |
| Pipelines | 96 | 48 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 11.2 billion / sec | 2.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 585 million | 585 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI, VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Hauteur | 2.7" (6.9 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 145 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1048 MB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1.8 GB/s | 1800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| CUDA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 410M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620 vs
IntelHD Graphics P3000
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6410D IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8330E
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8280E
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620 vs
AMDRadeon R5 Graphics
