NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 versus NVIDIA GeForce 410M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 and NVIDIA GeForce 410M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 4 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 11.2 billion / sec versus 4.6 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 96 versus 48
- 2.4x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 268.8 gflops versus 110.4 gflops
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 383 versus 267
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 158 versus 130
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 1571 versus 1003
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.046 versus 2.846
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 17.41 versus 7.048
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 614 versus 494
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1683 versus 1570
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 614 versus 494
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1683 versus 1570
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 15 May 2012 versus 5 January 2011 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 11.2 billion / sec versus 4.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 96 versus 48 |
| Performance á point flottant | 268.8 gflops versus 110.4 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 383 versus 267 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 158 versus 130 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1571 versus 1003 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.046 versus 2.846 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.41 versus 7.048 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 614 versus 494 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1683 versus 1570 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 614 versus 494 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1683 versus 1570 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 410M
- Environ 64% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1150 MHz versus 700 MHz
- 4.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 12 Watt versus 49 Watt
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 86.519 versus 83.907
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1150 MHz versus 700 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12 Watt versus 49 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 86.519 versus 83.907 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1163 versus 1162 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1163 versus 1162 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 410M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 | NVIDIA GeForce 410M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 383 | 267 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 158 | 130 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1571 | 1003 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.046 | 2.846 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 83.907 | 86.519 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.371 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.791 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.41 | 7.048 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 614 | 494 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1162 | 1163 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1683 | 1570 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 614 | 494 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1162 | 1163 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1683 | 1570 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 | NVIDIA GeForce 410M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | Fermi 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GF108 | GF119 |
| Date de sortie | 15 May 2012 | 5 January 2011 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $39.99 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1554 | 1557 |
| Prix maintenant | $39.99 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 13.32 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 700 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 96 | 48 |
| Performance á point flottant | 268.8 gflops | 110.4 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Température maximale du GPU | 98 °C | |
| Pipelines | 96 | 48 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 11.2 billion / sec | 4.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt | 12 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 585 million | 292 million |
| Gigaflops | 73 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI, VGA | DisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | PCI-E 2.0 |
| Hauteur | 2.7" (6.9 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 1 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 12.8 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1.8 GB/s | |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Power management | 8.0 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 410M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620 vs
IntelHD Graphics P3000
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6410D IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8330E
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8280E
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620 vs
AMDRadeon R5 Graphics
