NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 versus AMD Radeon HD 6770
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 and AMD Radeon HD 6770 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 66% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 65 Watt versus 108 Watt
- Environ 71% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 1050 MHz
| Date de sortie | 15 May 2012 versus 21 January 2011 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt versus 108 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6770
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 34.0 GTexel / s versus 12.96 GTexel / s
- 8.3x plus de pipelines: 800 versus 96
- 4.4x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,360.0 gflops versus 311.0 gflops
- Environ 85% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1262 versus 681
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 318 versus 225
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 3802 versus 2473
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 9.69 versus 6.498
- 4.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 615.217 versus 140.06
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.004 versus 0.502
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 26.748 versus 9.613
- 9.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 115.157 versus 12.49
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2546 versus 1151
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2279 versus 1853
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 2073
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2546 versus 1151
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2279 versus 1853
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 2073
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 34.0 GTexel / s versus 12.96 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 800 versus 96 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,360.0 gflops versus 311.0 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1262 versus 681 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 318 versus 225 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3802 versus 2473 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.69 versus 6.498 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 615.217 versus 140.06 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.004 versus 0.502 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.748 versus 9.613 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 115.157 versus 12.49 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2546 versus 1151 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2279 versus 1853 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 2073 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2546 versus 1151 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2279 versus 1853 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 2073 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6770
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 | AMD Radeon HD 6770 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 681 | 1262 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 225 | 318 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2473 | 3802 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.498 | 9.69 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 140.06 | 615.217 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.502 | 1.004 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.613 | 26.748 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.49 | 115.157 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1151 | 2546 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1853 | 2279 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2073 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1151 | 2546 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1853 | 2279 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2073 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 170 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 | AMD Radeon HD 6770 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale 2 |
| Nom de code | GF108 | Juniper |
| Date de sortie | 15 May 2012 | 21 January 2011 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $99.99 | $129 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1440 | 1117 |
| Prix maintenant | $99.21 | $76.99 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 8.89 | 27.17 |
| Conception | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 311.0 gflops | 1,360.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 96 | 800 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12.96 GTexel / s | 34.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 108 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 585 million | 1,040 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 900 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 145 mm | 198 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.8 GB / s | 76.8 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8300
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630 vs
NVIDIAQuadro NVS 450
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 435M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630 vs
NVIDIANVS 5400M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 720M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 810M
