NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 versus AMD Radeon HD 6790
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 and AMD Radeon HD 6790 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 1 mois plus tard
- 2.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 65 Watt versus 150 Watt
| Date de sortie | 15 May 2012 versus 4 April 2011 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt versus 150 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6790
- Environ 4% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 840 MHz versus 810 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 33.6 GTexel / s versus 12.96 GTexel / s
- 8.3x plus de pipelines: 800 versus 96
- 4.3x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,344.0 gflops versus 311.0 gflops
- 2.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4200 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- 2.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1552 versus 681
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 367 versus 225
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.318 versus 6.498
- 5.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 750.421 versus 140.06
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.234 versus 0.502
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 28.768 versus 9.613
- 9.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 121.423 versus 12.49
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3127 versus 1151
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3534 versus 1853
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 versus 2073
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3127 versus 1151
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3534 versus 1853
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 versus 2073
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 840 MHz versus 810 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 33.6 GTexel / s versus 12.96 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 800 versus 96 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,344.0 gflops versus 311.0 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4200 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1552 versus 681 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 367 versus 225 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.318 versus 6.498 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 750.421 versus 140.06 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.234 versus 0.502 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.768 versus 9.613 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 121.423 versus 12.49 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3127 versus 1151 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3534 versus 1853 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 versus 2073 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3127 versus 1151 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3534 versus 1853 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 versus 2073 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6790
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 | AMD Radeon HD 6790 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 681 | 1552 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 225 | 367 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2473 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.498 | 12.318 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 140.06 | 750.421 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.502 | 1.234 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.613 | 28.768 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.49 | 121.423 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1151 | 3127 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1853 | 3534 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2073 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1151 | 3127 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1853 | 3534 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2073 | 3350 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 170 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 | AMD Radeon HD 6790 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale 2 |
| Nom de code | GF108 | Barts |
| Date de sortie | 15 May 2012 | 4 April 2011 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $99.99 | $149 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1440 | 856 |
| Prix maintenant | $99.21 | $64.99 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 8.89 | 39.40 |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz | 840 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 311.0 gflops | 1,344.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 96 | 800 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12.96 GTexel / s | 33.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 585 million | 1,700 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 145 mm | 198 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 2x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.8 GB / s | 134.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 4200 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | GDDR5 |