NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 23% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 311.0 gflops versus 253.4 gflops
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 676 versus 555
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 218 versus 171
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.498 versus 5.332
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1151 versus 800
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1853 versus 1833
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1151 versus 800
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1853 versus 1833
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 15 May 2012 versus 22 March 2012 |
Performance á point flottant | 311.0 gflops versus 253.4 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 676 versus 555 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 218 versus 171 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.498 versus 5.332 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1151 versus 800 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1853 versus 1833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1151 versus 800 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1853 versus 1833 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
- Environ 50% de pipelines plus haut: 144 versus 96
- Environ 86% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 35 Watt versus 65 Watt
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2571 versus 2454
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 205.545 versus 140.06
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.635 versus 0.502
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.932 versus 9.613
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 22.728 versus 12.49
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2418 versus 2073
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2418 versus 2073
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 144 versus 96 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt versus 65 Watt |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2571 versus 2454 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 205.545 versus 140.06 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.635 versus 0.502 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.932 versus 9.613 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 22.728 versus 12.49 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2418 versus 2073 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2418 versus 2073 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 676 | 555 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 218 | 171 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2454 | 2571 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.498 | 5.332 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 140.06 | 205.545 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.502 | 0.635 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.613 | 10.932 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.49 | 22.728 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1151 | 800 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1853 | 1833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2073 | 2418 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1151 | 800 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1853 | 1833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2073 | 2418 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 170 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Fermi 2.0 |
Nom de code | GF108 | GF116 |
Date de sortie | 15 May 2012 | 22 March 2012 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $99.99 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1445 | 1446 |
Prix maintenant | $99.21 | |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 8.89 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 311.0 gflops | 253.4 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 144 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12.96 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 35 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 585 million | 1,170 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 753 MHz | |
Noyaux CUDA | Up to 144 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 145 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.8 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |