NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 1 mois plus tard
- 2.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 29 Watt versus 65 Watt
- Environ 3% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1650 MHz versus 1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3)
| Date de sortie | 27 March 2014 versus 1 February 2011 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 29 Watt versus 65 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1650 MHz versus 1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3) |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
- Environ 85% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1620 MHz versus 874 MHz
- Environ 86% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 13.0 billion / sec versus 6.992 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 96 versus 48
- Environ 85% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 311.04 gflops versus 167.8 gflops
- 2.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 774 versus 351
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 237 versus 163
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2626 versus 1367
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.139 versus 3.15
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 171.053 versus 84.603
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.65 versus 0.294
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 19.871 versus 10.608
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1208 versus 513
- 3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2053 versus 677
- 2.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3275 versus 1187
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1208 versus 513
- 3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2053 versus 677
- 2.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3275 versus 1187
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1620 MHz versus 874 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 13.0 billion / sec versus 6.992 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 96 versus 48 |
| Performance á point flottant | 311.04 gflops versus 167.8 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 774 versus 351 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 237 versus 163 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2626 versus 1367 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.139 versus 3.15 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.053 versus 84.603 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.65 versus 0.294 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.871 versus 10.608 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1208 versus 513 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2053 versus 677 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3275 versus 1187 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1208 versus 513 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2053 versus 677 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3275 versus 1187 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 351 | 774 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 163 | 237 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1367 | 2626 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.15 | 6.139 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 84.603 | 171.053 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.294 | 0.65 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 10.608 | 19.871 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 513 | 1208 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 677 | 2053 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1187 | 3275 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 513 | 1208 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 677 | 2053 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1187 | 3275 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.729 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi |
| Nom de code | GF119 | GF108 |
| Date de sortie | 27 March 2014 | 1 February 2011 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1591 | 1342 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $79 | |
| Prix maintenant | $69.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 14.03 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 874 MHz | 1620 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 167.8 gflops | 311.04 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 96 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 6.992 GTexel / s | 13.0 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 29 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 292 million | 585 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 96 | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 98 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, HDMIVGADual Link DVI |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 145 mm | 5.7" (14.5 cm) |
| Soutien de bus | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | 512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 13.2 GB / s | 28.8 (DDR3) – 51.2 (GDDR5) |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1650 MHz | 1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3) |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Mémoire config standard par GPU | 1 GB GDDR5 or 2 GB | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GT 705 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6600 GT
NVIDIAGeForce GT 705 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce 505 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GT 705 OEM vs
AMDRadeon HD 8180
NVIDIAGeForce GT 705 OEM vs
AMDRadeon R5 220 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GT 705 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 720
NVIDIAGeForce GT 705 OEM vs
AMDRadeon R2 Graphics
