NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 520
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 8% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 6.992 GTexel / s versus 6.5 billion / sec
- Environ 8% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 167.8 gflops versus 155.52 gflops
- Environ 83% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1650 MHz versus 900 MHz (DDR3)
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 347 versus 317
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 162 versus 135
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 1361 versus 1274
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.15 versus 2.597
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 84.603 versus 76.214
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.294 versus 0.239
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 10.608 versus 4.574
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 27 March 2014 versus 13 April 2011 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 6.992 GTexel / s versus 6.5 billion / sec |
| Performance á point flottant | 167.8 gflops versus 155.52 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1650 MHz versus 900 MHz (DDR3) |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 347 versus 317 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 162 versus 135 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1361 versus 1274 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.15 versus 2.597 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 84.603 versus 76.214 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.294 versus 0.239 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 10.608 versus 4.574 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 520
- Environ 85% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1620 MHz versus 874 MHz
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 545 versus 513
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 903 versus 677
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1455 versus 1187
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 545 versus 513
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 903 versus 677
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1455 versus 1187
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1620 MHz versus 874 MHz |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 545 versus 513 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 903 versus 677 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1455 versus 1187 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 545 versus 513 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 903 versus 677 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1455 versus 1187 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 520
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 347 | 317 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 162 | 135 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1361 | 1274 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.15 | 2.597 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 84.603 | 76.214 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.294 | 0.239 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 10.608 | 4.574 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 513 | 545 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 677 | 903 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1187 | 1455 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 513 | 545 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 677 | 903 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1187 | 1455 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.862 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GF119 | GF119 |
| Date de sortie | 27 March 2014 | 13 April 2011 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1581 | 1596 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $59 | |
| Prix maintenant | $59.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 7.58 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 874 MHz | 1620 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 167.8 gflops | 155.52 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 48 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 6.992 GTexel / s | 6.5 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 29 Watt | 29 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 292 million | 292 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 48 | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 102 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-IHDMIVGA (optional) |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 145 mm | 5.7" (14.5 cm) |
| Soutien de bus | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Hauteur | 2.7" (6.9 cm) | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB (DDR3) |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 13.2 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1650 MHz | 900 MHz (DDR3) |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GT 705 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6600 GT
NVIDIAGeForce GT 705 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6100 + nForce 405
NVIDIAGeForce GT 705 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6200 LE
NVIDIAGeForce GT 705 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce 505 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GT 705 OEM vs
NVIDIAGRID K340
NVIDIAGeForce GT 705 OEM vs
AMDRadeon R5 220 OEM
