NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 versus AMD Radeon HD 7570
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 and AMD Radeon HD 7570 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 8% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 700 MHz versus 650 MHz
- Environ 11% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 692.7 gflops versus 624 gflops
- Environ 22% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 49 Watt versus 60 Watt
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 830 versus 614
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2902 versus 1550
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.872 versus 4.874
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.817 versus 0.487
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1951 versus 1389
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1951 versus 1389
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 June 2014 versus 5 January 2012 |
Vitesse du noyau | 700 MHz versus 650 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 692.7 gflops versus 624 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt versus 60 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 830 versus 614 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2902 versus 1550 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.872 versus 4.874 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.817 versus 0.487 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 versus 1389 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 versus 1389 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7570
- Environ 8% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 15.6 GTexel / s versus 14.43 GTexel / s
- Environ 25% de pipelines plus haut: 480 versus 384
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 256 versus 253
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 259.769 versus 166.832
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 14.033 versus 12.415
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 57.396 versus 36.916
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2724 versus 1693
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 versus 3324
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2724 versus 1693
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 versus 3324
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 15.6 GTexel / s versus 14.43 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 480 versus 384 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 256 versus 253 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 259.769 versus 166.832 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.033 versus 12.415 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 57.396 versus 36.916 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2724 versus 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 versus 3324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2724 versus 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 versus 3324 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7570
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | AMD Radeon HD 7570 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 830 | 614 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 | 256 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2902 | 1550 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.872 | 4.874 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 166.832 | 259.769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.817 | 0.487 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.415 | 14.033 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.916 | 57.396 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 | 1389 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1693 | 2724 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 | 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 | 1389 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1693 | 2724 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 | 3355 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 327 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | AMD Radeon HD 7570 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale 2 |
Nom de code | GF108 | Turks |
Date de sortie | 18 June 2014 | 5 January 2012 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $59.99 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1311 | 1254 |
Prix maintenant | $54.99 | |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 20.48 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 700 MHz | 650 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 692.7 gflops | 624 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 480 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 14.43 GTexel / s | 15.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt | 60 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 585 million | 716 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 145 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 40.1 GB / s | 64 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1600 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR5 |