NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 versus AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 and AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 4 mois plus tard
- 2.6x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 49 Watt versus 125 Watt
- Environ 42% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1600 MHz versus 1125 MHz
Date de sortie | 18 June 2014 versus 15 February 2012 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt versus 125 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1600 MHz versus 1125 MHz |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 40 GTexel / s versus 14.43 GTexel / s
- Environ 67% de pipelines plus haut: 640 versus 384
- Environ 85% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,280 gflops versus 692.7 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 2.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2174 versus 830
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 462 versus 253
- 4.9x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 14263 versus 2902
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 33.836 versus 10.872
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 506.712 versus 166.832
- 3.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.01 versus 0.817
- 4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 49.787 versus 12.415
- 4.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 153.657 versus 36.916
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3707 versus 1951
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4524 versus 1693
- 4.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 14630 versus 3324
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3707 versus 1951
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4524 versus 1693
- 4.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 14630 versus 3324
- 2.2x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 711 versus 327
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 40 GTexel / s versus 14.43 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 versus 384 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,280 gflops versus 692.7 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2174 versus 830 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 462 versus 253 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14263 versus 2902 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.836 versus 10.872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 506.712 versus 166.832 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.01 versus 0.817 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.787 versus 12.415 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 153.657 versus 36.916 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3707 versus 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4524 versus 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 14630 versus 3324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3707 versus 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4524 versus 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 14630 versus 3324 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 711 versus 327 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 830 | 2174 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 | 462 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2902 | 14263 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.872 | 33.836 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 166.832 | 506.712 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.817 | 3.01 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.415 | 49.787 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.916 | 153.657 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 | 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1693 | 4524 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 | 14630 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 | 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1693 | 4524 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 | 14630 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 327 | 711 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi | GCN 1.0 |
Nom de code | GF108 | Cape Verde |
Date de sortie | 18 June 2014 | 15 February 2012 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $59.99 | $159 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1311 | 557 |
Prix maintenant | $54.99 | |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 20.48 | |
Conception | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 700 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 692.7 gflops | 1,280 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 14.43 GTexel / s | 40 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt | 125 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 585 million | 1,500 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz | |
Stream Processors | 640 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 145 mm | 210 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 40.1 GB / s | 72 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1600 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync |