NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 12% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 49 Watt versus 55 Watt
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 June 2014 versus 18 February 2014 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt versus 55 Watt |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 versus 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 versus 3309 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM
- Environ 48% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1033 MHz versus 700 MHz
- Environ 72% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 24.79 GTexel / s versus 14.43 GTexel / s
- Environ 15% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 793.3 gflops versus 692.7 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 13% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 1600 MHz
- 2.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2135 versus 830
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 475 versus 253
- 2.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 6108 versus 2902
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 24.117 versus 10.872
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 335.835 versus 166.832
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.651 versus 0.817
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.096 versus 12.415
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 97.126 versus 36.916
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2918 versus 1951
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1813 versus 1693
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2918 versus 1951
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1813 versus 1693
- 2x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 655 versus 327
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1033 MHz versus 700 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 24.79 GTexel / s versus 14.43 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 793.3 gflops versus 692.7 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 1 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 1600 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2135 versus 830 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 475 versus 253 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6108 versus 2902 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.117 versus 10.872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 335.835 versus 166.832 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.651 versus 0.817 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.096 versus 12.415 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 97.126 versus 36.916 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2918 versus 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1813 versus 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2918 versus 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1813 versus 1693 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 655 versus 327 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 830 | 2135 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 | 475 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2902 | 6108 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.872 | 24.117 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 166.832 | 335.835 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.817 | 1.651 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.415 | 27.096 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.916 | 97.126 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 | 2918 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1693 | 1813 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 | 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 | 2918 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1693 | 1813 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 | 3309 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 327 | 655 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Maxwell |
Nom de code | GF108 | GM107 |
Date de sortie | 18 June 2014 | 18 February 2014 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $59.99 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1311 | 979 |
Prix maintenant | $54.99 | |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 20.48 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 700 MHz | 1033 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 692.7 gflops | 793.3 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 14.43 GTexel / s | 24.79 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt | 55 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 585 million | 1,870 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 145 mm | 145 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 40.1 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1600 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3 |