NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 6 mois plus tard
- 3.9x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 33 Watt versus 130 Watt
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 2 GB versus 1536 MB
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 3325
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 3325
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 6 March 2014 versus 22 August 2012 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt versus 130 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1536 MB |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3325 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
- Environ 14% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 823 MHz versus 719 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 85.25 GTexel / s versus 11.5 GTexel / s
- 3x plus de pipelines: 1152 versus 384
- 3.7x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,046 gflops versus 552.2 gflops
- 3.1x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5600 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- 4.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 32.718 versus 7.814
- 6.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1021.371 versus 162.583
- 3.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.143 versus 0.798
- 4.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 56.509 versus 11.854
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 67.697 versus 30.631
- 3.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5983 versus 1654
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3665 versus 2370
- 3.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5983 versus 1654
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3665 versus 2370
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 823 MHz versus 719 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 85.25 GTexel / s versus 11.5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1152 versus 384 |
Performance á point flottant | 2,046 gflops versus 552.2 gflops |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5600 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 32.718 versus 7.814 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1021.371 versus 162.583 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.143 versus 0.798 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 56.509 versus 11.854 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 67.697 versus 30.631 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5983 versus 1654 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3665 versus 2370 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5983 versus 1654 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3665 versus 2370 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 812 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 174 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2975 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.814 | 32.718 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 162.583 | 1021.371 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.798 | 3.143 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.854 | 56.509 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.631 | 67.697 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1654 | 5983 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2370 | 3665 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1654 | 5983 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2370 | 3665 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3325 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Kepler |
Nom de code | GK208 | GK104 |
Date de sortie | 6 March 2014 | 22 August 2012 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1320 | 811 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 719 MHz | 823 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 552.2 gflops | 2,046 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 1152 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 11.5 GTexel / s | 85.25 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 130 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,270 million | 3,540 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 888 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Longeur | 241 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1536 MB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 134.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 5600 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 / GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
TXAA |