NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 41907 versus 39165
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 152.235 versus 134.765
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1843.045 versus 1316.075
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.681 versus 8.799
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 115.607 versus 94.915
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 644.098 versus 573.418
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12180 versus 10959
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 versus 3715
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 versus 3358
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12180 versus 10959
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 versus 3715
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 versus 3358
- 12x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3656 versus 305
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 2 Apr 2020 versus 30 April 2019 |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 41907 versus 39165 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 152.235 versus 134.765 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1843.045 versus 1316.075 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.681 versus 8.799 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 115.607 versus 94.915 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 644.098 versus 573.418 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12180 versus 10959 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8926 versus 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8062 versus 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12180 versus 10959 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8926 versus 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8062 versus 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3656 versus 305 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Environ 10% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1485 MHz versus 1350 MHz
- Environ 12% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1665 MHz versus 1485 MHz
- 5.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 8000 MHz versus 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 7881 versus 7539
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 564 versus 380
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1485 MHz versus 1350 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz versus 1485 MHz |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz versus 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7881 versus 7539 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 564 versus 380 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7539 | 7881 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 380 | 564 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 41907 | 39165 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 152.235 | 134.765 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1843.045 | 1316.075 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.681 | 8.799 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 115.607 | 94.915 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 644.098 | 573.418 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12180 | 10959 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8926 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8062 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12180 | 10959 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8926 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8062 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3656 | 305 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Nom de code | TU117 | TU107 |
| Date de sortie | 2 Apr 2020 | 30 April 2019 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 267 | 376 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $179 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1485 MHz | 1665 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1350 MHz | 1485 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 95.04 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.083 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.041 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1024 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 47.52 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 95.04 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
| Compte de transistor | 4700 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Compte DisplayPort | 1 | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.0 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 8000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
AMDRadeon R7 M380
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
AMDRadeon R9 390X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
AMDRadeon R9 Fury
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
NVIDIATesla T4
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
NVIDIAQuadro P5200
