NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti versus AMD Radeon R9 390X
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and AMD Radeon R9 390X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 41% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1485 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 95.04 GTexel/s versus 184.8 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 28 nm
- 5.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 275 Watt
- Environ 43% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) versus 1050 MHz
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 151.899 versus 114.288
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12180 versus 11675
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 versus 3706
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 versus 3350
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12180 versus 11675
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 versus 3706
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 versus 3350
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 2 Apr 2020 versus 18 June 2015 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1485 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 95.04 GTexel/s versus 184.8 GTexel / s |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 275 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) versus 1050 MHz |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 151.899 versus 114.288 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12180 versus 11675 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8926 versus 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8062 versus 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12180 versus 11675 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8926 versus 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8062 versus 3350 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 390X
- 2.8x plus de pipelines: 2816 versus 1024
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 9416 versus 7532
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 825 versus 385
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2911.861 versus 1844.67
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.947 versus 10.683
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 118.411 versus 115.919
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 683.568 versus 644.054
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4242 versus 3658
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 2816 versus 1024 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9416 versus 7532 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 825 versus 385 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2911.861 versus 1844.67 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.947 versus 10.683 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.411 versus 115.919 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 683.568 versus 644.054 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4242 versus 3658 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 390X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | AMD Radeon R9 390X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7532 | 9416 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 385 | 825 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 42186 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 151.899 | 114.288 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1844.67 | 2911.861 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.683 | 10.947 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 115.919 | 118.411 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 644.054 | 683.568 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12180 | 11675 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8926 | 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8062 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12180 | 11675 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8926 | 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8062 | 3350 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3658 | 4242 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | AMD Radeon R9 390X | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 2.0 |
Nom de code | TU117 | Grenada |
Date de sortie | 2 Apr 2020 | 18 June 2015 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 289 | 291 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Conception | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $429 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1485 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1350 MHz | |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 95.04 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.083 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.041 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1024 | 2816 |
Pixel fill rate | 47.52 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 95.04 GTexel/s | 184.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 275 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 4700 million | 6,200 million |
Unités de Compute | 44 | |
Performance á point flottant | 5,914 gflops | |
Stream Processors | 2816 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Longeur | 275 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.0 GB/s | 384 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 512 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 1050 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire de la bande passante haute (HBM) | ||
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |