NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 versus AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 27% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1485 MHz versus 1168 MHz
- Environ 30% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1665 MHz versus 1284 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 14 nm
- Environ 14% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 8000 MHz versus 7000 MHz
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 7881 versus 7657
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 39165 versus 34598
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 134.765 versus 122.268
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10959 versus 9258
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10959 versus 9258
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 30 April 2019 versus 15 October 2018 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1485 MHz versus 1168 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz versus 1284 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 14 nm |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz versus 7000 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7881 versus 7657 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39165 versus 34598 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 134.765 versus 122.268 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 versus 9258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 versus 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 versus 9258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 versus 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3351 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 676 versus 564
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1890.261 versus 1316.075
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.121 versus 8.799
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 117.008 versus 94.915
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 625.621 versus 573.418
- 2.8x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 849 versus 305
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 676 versus 564 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1890.261 versus 1316.075 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.121 versus 8.799 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.008 versus 94.915 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 625.621 versus 573.418 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 849 versus 305 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7881 | 7657 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 564 | 676 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39165 | 34598 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 134.765 | 122.268 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1316.075 | 1890.261 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.799 | 10.121 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.915 | 117.008 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 573.418 | 625.621 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 | 9258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 | 9258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3351 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 305 | 849 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
Nom de code | TU107 | Polaris 20 |
Date de sortie | 30 April 2019 | 15 October 2018 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $179 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 376 | 358 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz | 1284 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1485 MHz | 1168 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compte DisplayPort | 1 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 8-pin |
Longeur | 241 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz | 7000 MHz |