NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 46% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1530 MHz versus 1046 MHz
- Environ 65% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1785 MHz versus 1085 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 157.1 GTexel/s versus 134 billion / sec
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 84% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 125 Watt versus 230 Watt
- 3x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 6 GB versus 2 GB
- 2.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 12776 versus 5926
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 810 versus 560
- 3.4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 62624 versus 18372
- 3.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 187.131 versus 49.824
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2548.187 versus 1089.67
- 3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 15.882 versus 4.899
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 117.673 versus 44.06
- 8.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 901.388 versus 103.884
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17812 versus 7412
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 versus 3690
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17812 versus 7412
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 versus 3690
- 2.8x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5978 versus 2138
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 29 Oct 2019 versus 30 May 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz versus 1046 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz versus 1085 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 157.1 GTexel/s versus 134 billion / sec |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt versus 230 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 6 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12776 versus 5926 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 810 versus 560 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 62624 versus 18372 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 187.131 versus 49.824 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2548.187 versus 1089.67 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 15.882 versus 4.899 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.673 versus 44.06 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 901.388 versus 103.884 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17812 versus 7412 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 versus 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17812 versus 7412 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 versus 3340 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5978 versus 2138 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
- Environ 9% de pipelines plus haut: 1536 versus 1408
| Pipelines | 1536 versus 1408 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12776 | 5926 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 810 | 560 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 62624 | 18372 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 187.131 | 49.824 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2548.187 | 1089.67 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 15.882 | 4.899 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.673 | 44.06 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 901.388 | 103.884 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17812 | 7412 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17812 | 7412 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3340 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5978 | 2138 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Kepler |
| Nom de code | TU116 | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 29 Oct 2019 | 30 May 2013 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $229 | $399 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 207 | 524 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix maintenant | $449.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.45 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz | 1085 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz | 1046 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 157.1 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.05 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.027 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1408 | 1536 |
| Pixel fill rate | 85.68 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 157.1 GTexel/s | 134 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 230 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 6600 million | 3,540 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1536 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,333 gflops | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 98 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 9 inches (229 mm) | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | One 8-pin and one 6-pin |
| Largeur | Dual-slot | |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Énergie du systeme minimum recommandé | 600 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 6 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 336.0 GB/s | 224.3 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 bit | 256 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7012 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| PhysX | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
NVIDIAGRID M10-8Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
NVIDIATesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
AMDRadeon RX 5600M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
