NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 1% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1785 MHz versus 1771 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 50% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 120 Watt versus 180 Watt
- 800.4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 8004 MHz versus 10 GB/s
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 57946 versus 55425
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 189.842 versus 150.103
- 4.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 116.183 versus 27.417
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 875.838 versus 819.934
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 14 March 2019 versus 15 August 2016 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz versus 1771 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt versus 180 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8004 MHz versus 10 GB/s |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57946 versus 55425 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 189.842 versus 150.103 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 116.183 versus 27.417 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 875.838 versus 819.934 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
- Environ 5% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1607 MHz versus 1530 MHz
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2036.763 versus 1902.867
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.035 versus 13.408
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20151 versus 14998
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4646 versus 3717
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4195 versus 3359
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20151 versus 14998
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4646 versus 3717
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4195 versus 3359
- 6.8x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7209 versus 1067
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1607 MHz versus 1530 MHz |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2036.763 versus 1902.867 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.035 versus 13.408 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20151 versus 14998 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4646 versus 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4195 versus 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20151 versus 14998 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4646 versus 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4195 versus 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7209 versus 1067 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11659 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 777 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57946 | 55425 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 189.842 | 150.103 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1902.867 | 2036.763 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.408 | 14.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 116.183 | 27.417 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 875.838 | 819.934 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14998 | 20151 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 4646 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 4195 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14998 | 20151 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 4646 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 4195 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1067 | 7209 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Nom de code | TU116 | GP104 |
Date de sortie | 14 March 2019 | 15 August 2016 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $219 | $499.99 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 256 | 257 |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Prix maintenant | $439.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 43.70 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz | 1771 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 180 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 6,600 million | 7,200 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 2560 | |
Performance á point flottant | 9,068 gflops | |
Température maximale du GPU | 94 °C | |
Pipelines | 2560 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 283.4 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI |
Compte DisplayPort | 1 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 229 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
Vitesse de mémoire | 8004 MHz | 10 GB/s |
RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 320 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready |