NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2
- Environ 99% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 49.41 GTexel / s versus 24.8 billion / sec
- 2.7x plus de pipelines: 512 versus 192
- 2.7x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,581 gflops versus 595.2 gflops
- 3.2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4008 MHz versus 1250 MHz
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.212 versus 13.598
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 914.386 versus 404.618
- 4.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.262 versus 1.227
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 43.391 versus 25.333
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 99.735 versus 44.123
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 49.41 GTexel / s versus 24.8 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 512 versus 192 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,581 gflops versus 595.2 gflops |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4008 MHz versus 1250 MHz |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.212 versus 13.598 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 914.386 versus 404.618 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.262 versus 1.227 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 43.391 versus 25.333 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.735 versus 44.123 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M
- 3.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 244 Watt
Vitesse du noyau | 775 MHz versus 772 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 244 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.212 | 13.598 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 914.386 | 404.618 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.262 | 1.227 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 43.391 | 25.333 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.735 | 44.123 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1268 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 264 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4769 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1857 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3275 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3341 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1857 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3275 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3341 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Nom de code | GF110 | GF116 |
Date de sortie | 6 June 2011 | 30 May 2011 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1157 | 1158 |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 772 MHz | 775 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1,581 gflops | 595.2 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 192 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 49.41 GTexel / s | 24.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 244 Watt | 75 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,000 million | 1,170 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 192 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Longeur | 267 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
Soutien de bus | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Options SLI | 2-way | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1536 MB | 1536 MB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.4 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4008 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |