NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2
- Around 99% higher texture fill rate: 49.41 GTexel / s vs 24.8 billion / sec
- 2.7x more pipelines: 512 vs 192
- 2.7x better floating-point performance: 1,581 gflops vs 595.2 gflops
- 3.2x more memory clock speed: 4008 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.212 vs 13.598
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 914.386 vs 404.618
- 4.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.262 vs 1.227
- Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 43.391 vs 25.333
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 99.735 vs 44.123
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 49.41 GTexel / s vs 24.8 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 512 vs 192 |
Floating-point performance | 1,581 gflops vs 595.2 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.212 vs 13.598 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 914.386 vs 404.618 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.262 vs 1.227 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 43.391 vs 25.333 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.735 vs 44.123 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 244 Watt
Core clock speed | 775 MHz vs 772 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 244 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.212 | 13.598 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 914.386 | 404.618 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.262 | 1.227 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 43.391 | 25.333 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.735 | 44.123 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1268 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 264 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4769 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1857 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3275 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3341 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1857 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3275 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3341 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | GF110 | GF116 |
Launch date | 6 June 2011 | 30 May 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
Place in performance rating | 1157 | 1158 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 772 MHz | 775 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,581 gflops | 595.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 192 |
Texture fill rate | 49.41 GTexel / s | 24.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 244 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 1,170 million |
CUDA cores | 192 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 1536 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |