NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 10% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 48.0 billion / sec versus 43.6 GTexel / s
- 2.9x plus de pipelines: 960 versus 336
- Environ 20% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,256 gflops versus 1,045.6 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 60% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 100 Watt versus 160 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2717 versus 1872
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 10767 versus 7872
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4175 versus 3537
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3334 versus 3117
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4175 versus 3537
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3334 versus 3117
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 October 2012 versus 24 September 2011 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 48.0 billion / sec versus 43.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 960 versus 336 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,256 gflops versus 1,045.6 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt versus 160 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2717 versus 1872 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10767 versus 7872 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4175 versus 3537 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3334 versus 3117 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4175 versus 3537 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3334 versus 3117 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2
- Environ 30% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 778 MHz versus 600 MHz
- 2.2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4008 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 418 versus 371
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.161 versus 18.251
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 781.734 versus 665.068
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.125 versus 1.9
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 47.218 versus 36.241
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 75.212 versus 62.895
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 778 MHz versus 600 MHz |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4008 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 418 versus 371 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.161 versus 18.251 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 781.734 versus 665.068 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.125 versus 1.9 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 47.218 versus 36.241 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 75.212 versus 62.895 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3398 versus 3383 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3398 versus 3383 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2717 | 1872 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 371 | 418 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10767 | 7872 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.251 | 22.161 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 665.068 | 781.734 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.9 | 2.125 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.241 | 47.218 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 62.895 | 75.212 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4175 | 3537 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3383 | 3398 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3334 | 3117 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4175 | 3537 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3383 | 3398 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3334 | 3117 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GK104 | GF114 |
| Date de sortie | 1 October 2012 | 24 September 2011 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 837 | 838 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $199 | |
| Prix maintenant | $199.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.01 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 600 MHz | 778 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 960 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,256 gflops | 1,045.6 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 960 | 336 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 48.0 billion / sec | 43.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 160 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | 1,950 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Options SLI | 2-way | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 2x 6-pin |
| Longeur | 210 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 115.2 GB / s | 96.2 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 4008 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| FXAA | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675MX vs
AMDRadeon HD 6870
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675MX vs
AMDRadeon HD 6850
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675MX vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 460 v2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675MX vs
AMDRadeon HD 7790
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675MX vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675MX vs
AMDRadeon HD 8210E
