NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM versus AMD Radeon HD 7970M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM and AMD Radeon HD 7970M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 8% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 915 MHz versus 850 MHz
- Environ 61% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 109.8 GTexel / s versus 68 GTexel / s
- Environ 5% de pipelines plus haut: 1344 versus 1280
- Environ 21% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,634 gflops versus 2,176 gflops
- Environ 25% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 6008 MHz versus 4800 MHz
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 5241 versus 3529
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 579 versus 506
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1351.496 versus 1121.002
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 versus 3692
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 versus 3339
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 versus 3692
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 versus 3339
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 27 September 2013 versus 24 April 2012 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 915 MHz versus 850 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 109.8 GTexel / s versus 68 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1344 versus 1280 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,634 gflops versus 2,176 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz versus 4800 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5241 versus 3529 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 579 versus 506 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1351.496 versus 1121.002 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 versus 3692 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 versus 3692 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3339 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7970M
- Environ 70% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 100 Watt versus 170 Watt
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 22410 versus 14380
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 51.181 versus 41.336
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.355 versus 4.121
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 81.527 versus 58.14
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 256.99 versus 156.419
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt versus 170 Watt |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 22410 versus 14380 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 51.181 versus 41.336 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.355 versus 4.121 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 81.527 versus 58.14 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 256.99 versus 156.419 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7970M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | AMD Radeon HD 7970M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5241 | 3529 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 579 | 506 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14380 | 22410 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.336 | 51.181 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1351.496 | 1121.002 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.121 | 5.355 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.14 | 81.527 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 156.419 | 256.99 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3692 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3692 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5094 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5094 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | AMD Radeon HD 7970M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | GK104 | Wimbledon |
| Date de sortie | 27 September 2013 | 24 April 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 565 | 590 |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 980 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 915 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,634 gflops | 2,176 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1344 | 1280 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 109.8 GTexel / s | 68 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | 2,800 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Longeur | 241 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 6-pin | None |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.3 GB / s | 153.6 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz | 4800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs
ATIRadeon E2400
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs
NVIDIAQuadro 5010M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 670
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs
AMDFirePro D700
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs
AMDRadeon R9 M385X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
