NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 7% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 109.8 GTexel / s versus 102.5 billion / sec
- Environ 7% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,634 gflops versus 2,459.5 gflops
- 1001.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6008 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 579 versus 530
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1351.496 versus 971.208
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 58.14 versus 40.404
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 156.419 versus 86.208
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 versus 3686
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 versus 3686
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 27 September 2013 versus 10 May 2012 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 109.8 GTexel / s versus 102.5 billion / sec |
Performance á point flottant | 2,634 gflops versus 2,459.5 gflops |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 579 versus 530 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1351.496 versus 971.208 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.14 versus 40.404 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 156.419 versus 86.208 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 versus 3686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 versus 3686 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
- Environ 7% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 980 MHz versus 915 MHz
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 5331 versus 5241
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 15436 versus 14380
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 41.613 versus 41.336
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.281 versus 4.121
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz versus 915 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5331 versus 5241 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15436 versus 14380 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.613 versus 41.336 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.281 versus 4.121 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 versus 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 versus 3357 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5241 | 5331 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 579 | 530 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14380 | 15436 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.336 | 41.613 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1351.496 | 971.208 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.121 | 4.281 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.14 | 40.404 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 156.419 | 86.208 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7038 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7038 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1812 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Nom de code | GK104 | GK104 |
Date de sortie | 27 September 2013 | 10 May 2012 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 565 | 566 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | |
Prix maintenant | $474.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 13.20 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 980 MHz | 980 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 915 MHz | 980 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 2,634 gflops | 2,459.5 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1344 | 1344 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 109.8 GTexel / s | 102.5 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt | 170 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | 3,540 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 1344 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 97 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 241 mm | 9.5" (24.1 cm) |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 6-pin | Two 6-pin |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Options SLI | 3-way | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.3 GB / s | 192.2 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256-bit GDDR5 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz | 6.0 GB/s |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |