NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M versus NVIDIA Tesla C2075
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M and NVIDIA Tesla C2075 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 66% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 954 MHz versus 575 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 127.1 GTexel / s versus 32.2 GTexel / s
- 3.4x plus de pipelines: 1536 versus 448
- 3x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,050 gflops versus 1,030.4 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 122 Watt versus 247 Watt
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 8 GB versus 6 GB
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3783 versus 3017
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 15023 versus 9885
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 34.42 versus 26.973
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.915 versus 3.142
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4501 versus 2825
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4501 versus 2825
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 12 March 2014 versus 25 July 2011 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz versus 575 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 127.1 GTexel / s versus 32.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 versus 448 |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,050 gflops versus 1,030.4 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt versus 247 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 6 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3783 versus 3017 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15023 versus 9885 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.42 versus 26.973 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.915 versus 3.142 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4501 versus 2825 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4501 versus 2825 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3346 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla C2075
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 428 versus 332
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 930.623 versus 776.776
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.924 versus 36.688
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 93.747 versus 82.511
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 428 versus 332 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 930.623 versus 776.776 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.924 versus 36.688 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 93.747 versus 82.511 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla C2075
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M | NVIDIA Tesla C2075 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3783 | 3017 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 332 | 428 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15023 | 9885 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.42 | 26.973 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 776.776 | 930.623 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.915 | 3.142 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.688 | 45.924 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 82.511 | 93.747 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4501 | 2825 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4501 | 2825 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3346 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1611 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M | NVIDIA Tesla C2075 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GK104 | GF110 |
| Date de sortie | 12 March 2014 | 25 July 2011 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 781 | 782 |
| Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 993 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz | 575 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1536 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,050 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 448 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 127.1 GTexel / s | 32.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt | 247 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | 3,000 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Longeur | 248 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 160.0 GB / s | 144.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 3000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
ATIMobility FireGL V5000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX Go1400
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
ATIRadeon X550 XT
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 3600M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
AMDRadeon HD 6970M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
NVIDIATesla C2075
