NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M versus AMD Radeon HD 6970M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M and AMD Radeon HD 6970M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 40% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 954 MHz versus 680 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 127.1 GTexel / s versus 32.6 GTexel / s
- Environ 60% de pipelines plus haut: 1536 versus 960
- 2.3x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,050 gflops versus 1,305.6 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 8x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3783 versus 2270
- 4.5x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 15023 versus 3349
- 7.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 34.42 versus 4.787
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 776.776 versus 617.819
- 4.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.915 versus 0.927
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 36.688 versus 24.456
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 versus 3229
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 versus 3229
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 12 March 2014 versus 4 January 2011 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz versus 680 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 127.1 GTexel / s versus 32.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 versus 960 |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,050 gflops versus 1,305.6 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 1 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3783 versus 2270 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15023 versus 3349 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.42 versus 4.787 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 776.776 versus 617.819 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.915 versus 0.927 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.688 versus 24.456 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3229 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3229 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3342 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6970M
- Environ 63% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 122 Watt
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 656 versus 332
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 117.801 versus 82.511
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 122 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 656 versus 332 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 117.801 versus 82.511 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6970M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M | AMD Radeon HD 6970M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3783 | 2270 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 332 | 656 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15023 | 3349 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.42 | 4.787 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 776.776 | 617.819 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.915 | 0.927 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.688 | 24.456 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 82.511 | 117.801 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4501 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3229 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4501 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3229 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3342 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1611 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M | AMD Radeon HD 6970M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
| Nom de code | GK104 | Blackcomb |
| Date de sortie | 12 March 2014 | 4 January 2011 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 780 | 782 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 993 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz | 680 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1536 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,050 gflops | 1,305.6 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 960 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 127.1 GTexel / s | 32.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | 1,700 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Taille du laptop | large | large |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 160.0 GB / s | 115.2 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 3600 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX Go1400
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
ATIRadeon X550 XT
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
ATIRadeon HD 2900 GT
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 3600M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
AMDRadeon HD 6970M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
NVIDIATesla C2075
