NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 12% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 924 MHz versus 824 MHz
- Environ 54% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 60.8 GTexel / s versus 39.55 GTexel / s
- Environ 78% de pipelines plus haut: 1024 versus 576
- 2.1x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,946 gflops versus 949.2 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 25% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 5012 MHz versus 4000 MHz
- 4.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 56.869 versus 13.806
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 917.535 versus 546.51
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.351 versus 1.535
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.323 versus 27.524
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 86.304 versus 38.664
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 January 2016 versus 22 April 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 924 MHz versus 824 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 60.8 GTexel / s versus 39.55 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1024 versus 576 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,946 gflops versus 949.2 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz versus 4000 MHz |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 56.869 versus 13.806 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 917.535 versus 546.51 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.351 versus 1.535 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.323 versus 27.524 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 86.304 versus 38.664 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 56.869 | 13.806 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 917.535 | 546.51 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.351 | 1.535 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.323 | 27.524 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 86.304 | 38.664 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1877 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 430 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5235 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1435 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3531 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3300 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1435 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3531 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3300 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
Nom de code | GM206 | GK106 |
Date de sortie | 1 January 2016 | 22 April 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1174 | 964 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 950 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 924 MHz | 824 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1,946 gflops | 949.2 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 576 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 60.8 GTexel / s | 39.55 GTexel / s |
Compte de transistor | 2,940 million | 2,540 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Longeur | 147 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.19 GB / s | 64 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |