NVIDIA GeForce MX130 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce MX130 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce MX130
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 6% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1122 MHz versus 1058 MHz
- Environ 17% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 953.9 gflops versus 812.5 gflops
- 2.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 30 Watt versus 64 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- 1002.4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5012 MHz versus 5.0 GB/s
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1814 versus 1749
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 6461 versus 4493
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 31.613 versus 12.582
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 406.203 versus 364.463
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.034 versus 1.254
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.251 versus 18.386
- 4.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 107.608 versus 23.499
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2796 versus 2663
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3686 versus 3478
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 versus 3332
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2796 versus 2663
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3686 versus 3478
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 versus 3332
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 632 versus 545
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 17 November 2017 versus 27 November 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1122 MHz versus 1058 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 953.9 gflops versus 812.5 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt versus 64 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz versus 5.0 GB/s |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1814 versus 1749 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6461 versus 4493 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.613 versus 12.582 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 406.203 versus 364.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.034 versus 1.254 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.251 versus 18.386 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.608 versus 23.499 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2796 versus 2663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3686 versus 3478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3332 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2796 versus 2663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3686 versus 3478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3332 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 632 versus 545 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
- Environ 14% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 33.9 billion / sec versus 29.81 GTexel / s
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 368 versus 195
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 33.9 billion / sec versus 29.81 GTexel / s |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 368 versus 195 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX130
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce MX130 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1814 | 1749 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 195 | 368 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6461 | 4493 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.613 | 12.582 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 406.203 | 364.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.034 | 1.254 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.251 | 18.386 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.608 | 23.499 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2796 | 2663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3686 | 3478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3332 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2796 | 2663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3686 | 3478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3332 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 632 | 545 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce MX130 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Nom de code | GM108 | GK106 |
Date de sortie | 17 November 2017 | 27 November 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1013 | 1003 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $109 | |
Prix maintenant | $144.81 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 16.05 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1242 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1122 MHz | 1058 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 953.9 gflops | 812.5 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 29.81 GTexel / s | 33.9 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 64 Watt |
Noyaux CUDA | 384 | |
Compte de transistor | 2,540 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini..., 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | One 6-pin |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
Longeur | 5.70" (14.5 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 40.1 GB / s | 80.0 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128-bit GDDR5 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | 5.0 GB/s |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 / DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
FXAA | ||
TXAA |