NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 64091 versus 55390
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 234.866 versus 182.11
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2849.031 versus 1797.792
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 17.956 versus 14.071
- 5.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 147.291 versus 26.444
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3707 versus 3638
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3707 versus 3638
- 3.8x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5513 versus 1470
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 6 January 2019 versus 2 November 2017 |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 16 nm |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 64091 versus 55390 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 234.866 versus 182.11 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2849.031 versus 1797.792 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.956 versus 14.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 147.291 versus 26.444 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 versus 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 versus 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 versus 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 versus 3344 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5513 versus 1470 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
- Environ 27% de pipelines plus haut: 2432 versus 1920
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 8 GB versus 6 GB
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 14697 versus 9715
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 877 versus 412
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1035.984 versus 809.639
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16128 versus 15485
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16128 versus 15485
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 2432 versus 1920 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 6 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14697 versus 9715 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 877 versus 412 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1035.984 versus 809.639 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16128 versus 15485 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16128 versus 15485 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9715 | 14697 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 412 | 877 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 64091 | 55390 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 234.866 | 182.11 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2849.031 | 1797.792 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.956 | 14.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 147.291 | 26.444 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 809.639 | 1035.984 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15485 | 16128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 | 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15485 | 16128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 | 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3344 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5513 | 1470 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Nom de code | TU106 | GP104 |
Date de sortie | 6 January 2019 | 2 November 2017 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 243 | 246 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | |
Prix maintenant | $379.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 44.74 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 1920 | 2432 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1683 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1607 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 8,186 gflops | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 255.8 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | |
Compte de transistor | 7,200 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Taille du laptop | large | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Longeur | 267 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
Vulkan | ||
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 6 GB | 8 GB |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 256.3 GB / s | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
VR Ready | ||
Multi-Projection |