NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q versus NVIDIA Quadro P5000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro P5000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 64091 versus 52901
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 234.866 versus 223.558
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2849.031 versus 2698.914
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 17.956 versus 14.206
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 147.291 versus 140.845
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3707 versus 3409
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 versus 3077
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3707 versus 3409
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 versus 3077
- 4.2x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5513 versus 1326
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 6 January 2019 versus 1 October 2016 |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 16 nm |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 64091 versus 52901 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 234.866 versus 223.558 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2849.031 versus 2698.914 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.956 versus 14.206 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 147.291 versus 140.845 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 versus 3409 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 versus 3077 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 versus 3409 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 versus 3077 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5513 versus 1326 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P5000
- Environ 7% de pipelines plus haut: 2048 versus 1920
- 2.7x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 6 GB
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 12631 versus 9715
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 672 versus 412
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 927.006 versus 809.639
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 2048 versus 1920 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 6 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12631 versus 9715 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 672 versus 412 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 927.006 versus 809.639 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15489 versus 15485 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15489 versus 15485 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P5000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9715 | 12631 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 412 | 672 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 64091 | 52901 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 234.866 | 223.558 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2849.031 | 2698.914 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.956 | 14.206 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 147.291 | 140.845 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 809.639 | 927.006 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15485 | 15489 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 | 3409 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3077 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15485 | 15489 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 | 3409 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3077 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5513 | 1326 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro P5000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Nom de code | TU106 | GP104 |
| Date de sortie | 6 January 2019 | 1 October 2016 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 243 | 245 |
| Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $2,499 | |
| Prix maintenant | $1,699.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 8.38 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Pipelines | 1920 | 2048 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1733 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1607 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 8,873 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 277.3 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
| Compte de transistor | 7,200 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort | |
| Display Port | 1.4 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Longeur | 267 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 6 GB | 16 GB |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192 GB / s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 9016 MHz | |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| VR Ready | ||
| 3D Stereo | ||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro P5000
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 56
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX 5600M
