NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 versus AMD Radeon Pro Duo
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 and AMD Radeon Pro Duo pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 68% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1680 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 160 Watt versus 350 Watt
- 28x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 500 MHz
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 14152 versus 8164
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 70763 versus 53806
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 220.337 versus 141.474
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.852 versus 13.132
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 135.923 versus 112.973
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1141.283 versus 799.933
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20094 versus 10141
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7442 versus 3713
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20094 versus 10141
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7442 versus 3713
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 7 January 2019 versus 26 April 2016 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1680 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt versus 350 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 500 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14152 versus 8164 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 70763 versus 53806 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 220.337 versus 141.474 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.852 versus 13.132 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.923 versus 112.973 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1141.283 versus 799.933 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 versus 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 versus 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 versus 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 versus 3713 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro Duo
- 4.3x plus de pipelines: 2x 4096 versus 1920
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 8 GB versus 6 GB
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 765 versus 750
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3621.344 versus 3131.344
- 5.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 38251 versus 6714
- 5.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 38251 versus 6714
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 2x 4096 versus 1920 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 6 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 765 versus 750 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3621.344 versus 3131.344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 38251 versus 6714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 38251 versus 6714 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Duo
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | AMD Radeon Pro Duo |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14152 | 8164 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 750 | 765 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 70763 | 53806 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 220.337 | 141.474 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3131.344 | 3621.344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.852 | 13.132 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.923 | 112.973 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1141.283 | 799.933 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 | 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 | 38251 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 | 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 | 38251 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7487 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | AMD Radeon Pro Duo | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 3.0 |
Nom de code | TU106 | Capsaicin |
Date de sortie | 7 January 2019 | 26 April 2016 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $349 | $1,499 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 150 | 188 |
Prix maintenant | $349.99 | $849 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 62.74 | 17.05 |
Conception | reference | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1680 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1365 MHz | |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1920 | 2x 4096 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 350 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 10,800 million | 8,900 million |
Unités de Compute | 128 | |
Performance á point flottant | 2x 8,192 gflops | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compte DisplayPort | 2 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 229 mm | 277 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 3x 8-pin |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | DirectX® 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 6 GB | 8 GB |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | 2x 4096 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 500 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 512 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
Enduro | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
ZeroCore |