NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 4% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1680 MHz versus 1620 MHz
- Environ 9% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 160 Watt versus 175 Watt
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7442 versus 3718
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6714 versus 3350
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7442 versus 3718
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6714 versus 3350
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 7 January 2019 versus 17 October 2018 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1680 MHz versus 1620 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt versus 175 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 versus 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 versus 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 versus 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 versus 3350 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
- Environ 3% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1410 MHz versus 1365 MHz
- Environ 20% de pipelines plus haut: 2304 versus 1920
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 16173 versus 14150
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 824 versus 750
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 87137 versus 70661
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 252.062 versus 220.337
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3729.447 versus 3131.344
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 27.133 versus 21.852
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 154.621 versus 135.923
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1303.435 versus 1141.283
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22615 versus 20094
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22615 versus 20094
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8871 versus 7488
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz versus 1365 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2304 versus 1920 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16173 versus 14150 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 824 versus 750 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 87137 versus 70661 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.062 versus 220.337 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3729.447 versus 3131.344 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.133 versus 21.852 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 154.621 versus 135.923 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1303.435 versus 1141.283 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22615 versus 20094 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22615 versus 20094 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8871 versus 7488 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14150 | 16173 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 750 | 824 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 70661 | 87137 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 220.337 | 252.062 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3131.344 | 3729.447 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.852 | 27.133 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.923 | 154.621 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1141.283 | 1303.435 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 | 22615 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 | 22615 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 | 3350 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7488 | 8871 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Nom de code | TU106 | TU106 |
| Date de sortie | 7 January 2019 | 17 October 2018 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $349 | $499 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 150 | 140 |
| Prix maintenant | $349.99 | $499.99 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 62.74 | 42.76 |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1680 MHz | 1620 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1365 MHz | 1410 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Pipelines | 1920 | 2304 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 175 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 10,800 million | 10,800 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
| Compte DisplayPort | 2 | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 229 mm | 229 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 6 GB | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 vs
NVIDIATITAN V
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5300
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6600M
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 1010
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 vs
AMDRadeon 760M
